Published in LiP
Magazine
[http://www.lipmagazine.org]
SUBURBAN
SWEATSHOPS
Jennifer
Gordon
Harvard
University Press 2005
Reviewed
by Gabriel Thompson
06.21.05
A PERSON WOULD BE HARD PRESSED TO INVENT A MORE DIFFICUILT ENVIRONMENT TO ORGANIZE.
Recently arrived Latina/o immigrants—the vast majority of them undocumented—gather
each morning on Long Island corners, desperate for work. Employers pull up in
trucks on their way to worksites, setting off a bidding war among the laborers
to see who among the group will work for the lowest wages. Those too proud to
drop their going rate quickly learn that the only award for their principled
stand is another day without work. With so many individual agreements between
unknown bosses and vulnerable immigrants, abuse is rampant. And if, by chance,
one case is won against the employers, rest assured that tomorrow will bring
dozens more willing to risk a small fine by paying well below the minimum wage
or withholding payment entirely.
Day laborers involved in landscaping, construction, and domestic work—jobs
that are ever in flux and at scattered sites—are among the most difficult
to organize. For this reason, unions have largely focused on organizing workers
a few steps up the economic ladder; this more easily leverages unions’
role within an industry. One battle-hardened labor organizer visited Long Island
to provide tactical advice to Jennifer Gordon’s Workplace Project, which
was then planning a campaign to increase the going wages at several busy corners.
After witnessing the chaos and disorganization on the corners, he saw no chance
of success. “Give it up and go find an organizing campaign where you have
a prayer of success,” he told Gordon.
Gordon, of course, did not give up, and her recent book Suburban Sweatshops
is a primer for budding organizers and a thoughtful reply to skeptics like the
aforementioned union official. Yet Gordon’s most valuable contribution
to the practice of organizing is her sober analysis of the difficulties inherent
in the task, and her willingness to acknowledge the limitations of any chosen
tactic. In a field that tends to create a few especially loud individuals who
make grandiose claims and boast about the discovery of “the one model
that works,” Gordon is humble and clear-eyed, modest but motivated.
Gordon founded the Long Island based Workplace Project in 1992, and was its
director until 1998 (she is now an associate professor at the Fordham School
of Law). The project is primarily made up of Central American and Mexican immigrants,
and most of its 500 members are not citizens. Nevertheless, in 1997 they were
able to pass statewide legislation entitled the Unpaid Wages Prohibition Act,
which dramatically increased the fines for employers that pay below the minimum
wage.
Yet equally important, as Gordon writes in a chapter titled “Noncitizen
Citizenship,” was the realization among members that they could indeed
dare to become political actors. “A new thought begins to gain currency:
‘We probably can’t win. But we might learn a lot—and what
do we stand to lose if we try?’” What members and Gordon learned
was that not only could they pass legislation, but that they could, in fact,
do it from the ground up, with low-wage undocumented workers driving the campaign—leading
meetings with politicians, conducting sustained protests against opponents,
and achieving media coverage that highlighted the need for reform.
Not everything was easy, however. For aspiring organizers, the chapter entitled
“A Legal Clinic and Organizing” contains 52 pages of essential reading.
In straightforward prose, Gordon chronicles the internal debates at the Workplace
Project over the presence of a legal clinic at the workers’ center, and
in the process neatly outlines the tensions and contradictions between organizing
and providing services. For inexperienced organizers, a legal clinic for workers
would seem uncontroversial. What better way to bring in new members than to
demonstrate that tangible wins are possible? Yet, as Gordon writes—in
a sentiment that permeates her entire book—“all is not so simple.”
Organizing and the development of leaders, after all, are based upon the core
belief that people have the ability to achieve change on their own, without
relying upon others with specialized knowledge. By holding legal clinics for
workers, the inevitable message was sent that workers didn’t need to organize
and challenge employers collectively, but simply file individual lawsuits and
watch attorneys go to work on their behalf. In addition, Gordon notes that once
potential workplace leaders won their lawsuits, they disappeared: “By
‘paying off’ the bravest and most determined workers with a settlement
or an award [we were] unwittingly playing the role of the employer who decapitates
an organizing effort by making a deal with its leaders.”
Yet the legal clinic did bring new leaders in, and the use of lawyers enabled
workers to battle their employers and, at times, to fit into a larger organizing
campaign against a specific boss. In the end, the Workplace Project decided
to continue the legal clinic, but also required people to give back to the organization
by participating in committees and taking a Workers’ Course where they
would discuss and analyze the exploitation that they faced, look at previous
efforts to organize for change, and receive training on basic organizing techniques.
As Gordon writes: “If outreach and the legal clinic were the broad mouth
of the Workplace Project’s funnel, the Workers Course was its narrowing
point. All immigrants who wanted to become members had to pass through it.”
Gordon’s discussion of the inevitable tensions between organizing and
service provision, and her eventual conclusion that the best one can do is juggle
contradictions in a way that works more often than it fails, is the result of
her many years actually spent organizing (as opposed to simply talking about
it). For Gordon, the process of organizing demands constant experimentation,
reflection, and analysis—the learning curve is nearly infinite. There
is no “one size fits all” when it comes to organizing; what works
today, works today. Tomorrow, it very well might need to be abandoned.
And yet, with many caveats, extreme modesty, and a clearheaded analysis about
the structural difficulties in organizing low-wage immigrant workers, the real
spirit of Gordon’s work and attitude is summed up in her final sentence:
“[The Workplace Project] has shown that, try as we might to assess power
with a clear, cold eye, to pin it down on the page according to the characteristics
of a community or a labor market, there is often room for surprising change.”
[ L i P ]
EMAIL THIS ARTICLE TO A FRIEND. CLICK HERE.